Abstract #86439 Published in IGR 21-2

Intermediate Outcomes of a Novel Standalone Ab Externo SIBS Microshunt With Mitomycin C

Schlenker MB; Durr GM; Michaelov E; Ahmed IIK
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 215: 141-153

See also comment(s) by Steve Mansberger

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy, risk factors for failure, and adverse events of a standalone novel ab externo SIBS microshunt with mitomycin C (MMC) during 1-year follow-up. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. SUBJECTS: Glaucomatous eyes with an intraocular pressure (IOP) above target and/or progressing on maximally tolerated medical therapy. METHODS: Consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and no previous filtering surgery received an ab externo SIBS microshunt with MMC from July 2015 to November 2017. Main outcome measures were proportion of eyes at 1-year with (1) no 2 consecutive IOP readings >17 mm Hg or clinical hypotony without (complete) or with glaucoma medications (qualified); and (2) at least a 20% reduction from decision IOP. Secondary outcomes included upper IOP thresholds of 14 mm Hg and 21 mm Hg with and without a 20% IOP reduction from baseline, median IOP, medications, risk factors for failure, interventions, complications, and reoperations. RESULTS: A total of 164 eyes in 132 patients were included. Complete success was achieved in 76.9% of eyes, qualified success in 92.5%. Complete success was 75.6% for an upper IOP cut-off of 14 mm Hg and 76.9% for 21 mm Hg, and qualified success was 91.9% and 92.5%. MMC dose of 0.2 vs 0.4-0.5 mg/mL (hazard ratio [HR] 2.51; 95% CI 1.12-5.65) and primary open-angle glaucoma vs secondary open-angle glaucoma (SOAG) (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.01-6.23) represented the only risk factors for failure in multivariable analysis. Needling was performed in 8.5% of eyes. Two eyes received surgical revision, and 1 a reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: One-year results of the ab externo SIBS microshunt demonstrated promising rates of qualified and complete success, decreased drop use, few complications, and infrequent postoperative interventions.

Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address:

Full article


12.8.2 With tube implant or other drainage devices (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)
12.8.10 Woundhealing antifibrosis (Part of: 12 Surgical treatment > 12.8 Filtering surgery)

Issue 21-2

Change Issue