advertisement

Oculus

Abstract #91639 Published in IGR 21-4

Assessing Functional Disability in Glaucoma: The Relative Importance of Central Versus Far Peripheral Visual Fields

Odden JL; Mihailovic A; Boland MV; Friedman DS; West SK; Ramulu PY
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2020; 61: 23

See also comment(s) by Anders Heijl


PURPOSE: To evaluate the importance of central versus far peripheral visual field (VF) loss in assessing disability in glaucoma. METHODS: In total, 231 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma completed 24-2 VF testing and automated peripheral VFs using the suprathreshold 30- to 60-degree pattern. Questionnaires assessed fear of falling (FoF), quality of life (QOL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), and driving habits; nonsedentary time, reading speed, and gait were objectively measured. Multivariable regression models analyzed the effect of central VF and/or peripheral VF damage on each outcome. RESULTS: In models including both central and peripheral VF damage (independent effects), greater central, but not peripheral, VF damage was associated with greater FoF, worse QOL, fewer daily steps, and difficulty with IADLs (P < 0.02 for central; P > 0.5 for peripheral). For gait measures, greater peripheral, but not central, damage was associated with shorter steps and shorter strides, as well as greater variability in step length (P < 0.03 for peripheral; P > 0.14 for central). Model R2 values were not substantially higher (less than 5% additional explained variability) for models including both central and peripheral VF damage as compared to the best models incorporating only one region of VF damage (i.e., central or peripheral). CONCLUSIONS: The relative importance of central 24 degrees versus more peripheral VF damage differs across functional domains in patients with glaucoma. Central damage is more strongly associated with most disability outcomes, although peripheral damage is more associated with specific gait measures. Studies examining the relative importance of various VF regions should assess functional domain separately and eschew integrated measures of quality of life/activity limitation.

Eye and Ear Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.

Full article

Classification:

1.4 Quality of life (Part of: 1 General aspects)
6.6.2 Automated (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.6 Visual field examination and other visual function tests)



Issue 21-4

Change Issue


advertisement

Oculus