advertisement
Okude S 25
Showing records 1 to 25 | Display all abstracts from Okude S119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Nishijima E
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122040 Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects
Nishijima E
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 0:
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Nishijima E
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
122040 Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects
Itoh Y
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 0:
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Fukai K
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Hosaka D
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Fukai K
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
122040 Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects
Noro T
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 0:
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Sano K
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Ogawa S
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Noro T
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
122040 Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects
Ogawa S
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 0:
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Itoh Y; Noro T
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Ogawa S
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
122040 Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects
Okude S
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 0:
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Okude S
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Okude S
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
122040 Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects
Nakano T
Journal of Glaucoma 2024; 0:
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Sano K
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Tatemichi M; Lee GC
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Yoshikawa K
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Iwase A
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Tatemichi M
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
122658 Comparative Analysis of 24-2C, 24-2, and 10-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Mild-Stage Glaucoma With Central Visual field Defects
Nakano T
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2024; 268: 275-284
119682 Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
Nakano T
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9
