advertisement

Topcon

Abstract #55451 Published in IGR 15-4

Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL

Barkana Y; Gutfreund S
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 2014; 42: 608-614


BACKGROUND: Change in intraocular pressure is known to occur with body posture. Previously, markedly different estimations of this change were reported. The Icare Pro (Icare; Tiolat Oy, Helsinki, Finland) is designed to measure intraocular pressure with the subject supine. We compared the measurement of postural change in intraocular pressure obtained with this and 3 other tonometers: Goldmann applanation tonometer (CSO, Firenze, Italy), Pneumatonometer (Model 30, Reichert, Depew, NY, USA) and the Tonopen XL (Reichert). DESIGN: Prospective comparative study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one healthy subjects. METHODS: Intraocular pressure was measured in random order with four tonometers, first sitting then after 10 min of lying. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average postural intraocular pressure change (mmHg) and the 95% limits of agreement for measuring postural intraocular pressure change between tonometers. RESULTS: Average postural intraocular pressure change (lying minus sitting, mmHg) was measured highest with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (4.1 ± 2.6) and Pneumatonometer (3.9 ± 2.1), significantly lower with the Tonopen (0.9 ± 1.7) and was negative with the Icare (-0.9 ± 3.3). The 95% limits of agreement for measuring postural intraocular pressure change between Goldmann applanation tonometer and Icare, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen were -3.2-13.3, -6.4-6.9 and -2.8-9.4 mmHg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postural change in intraocular pressure was measured similarly, on average, with Goldmann applanation tonometer and Pneumatonometer, and much lower with Tonopen and Icare Pro. There was poor interdevice agreement in measuring this parameter. We observed high intersubject variability, suggesting the clinical importance of this measurement in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.

Full article

Classification:

6.1.3 Factors affecting IOP (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.1 Intraocular pressure measurement; factors affecting IOP)
6.1.1 Devices, techniques (Part of: 6 Clinical examination methods > 6.1 Intraocular pressure measurement; factors affecting IOP)



Issue 15-4

Change Issue


advertisement

Topcon