advertisement
6.9.1.1 Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (92)
Showing records 1 to 25
Display all abstracts in classification 6.9.1.1 Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy
Search within classification 6.9.1.1 Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy60121 Comparison study of OCT, HRT and VF findings among normal controls and patients with pseudoexfoliation, with or without increased IOP
Riga F
Clinical Ophthalmology 2014; 8: 2441-2447
60685 Morphological features and important parameters of large optic discs for diagnosing glaucoma
Okimoto S
PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0118920
60364 Ethnic differences in trabecular meshwork height by optical coherence tomography
Chen RI
JAMA ophthalmology 2015; 133: 437-441
60602 Corneoscleral limbus in glaucoma patients: in vivo confocal microscopy and immunocytological study
Mastropasqua R
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2015; 56: 2050-2058
60116 Enhanced structure-function relationship in glaucoma with an anatomically and geometrically accurate neuroretinal rim measurement
Danthurebandara VM
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2015; 56: 98-105
60656 Comparison of Three Types of Images for the Detection of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defects
Bae HW
Optometry and Vision Science 2015; 0:
60316 Evaluation of Corneal Microstructure in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Glaucoma: In Vivo Scanning Laser Confocal Microscopic Study
Yüksel N
Current Eye Research 2015; 0: 1-7
60404 Detecting the progression of normal tension glaucoma: a comparison of perimetry, optic coherence tomography, and Heidelberg retinal tomography
Yoon JY
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; 29: 31-39
60736 Cup-to-Disc Ratio From Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography Agrees Poorly With Clinical Assessment
Perera SA
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 198-202
60755 Automated Registration of Multimodal Optic Disc Images: Clinical Assessment of Alignment Accuracy
Ng WS
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 397-402
60241 Adaptive optics imaging of healthy and abnormal regions of retinal nerve fiber bundles of patients with glaucoma
Chen MF
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2015; 56: 674-681
60693 Compass: clinical evaluation of a new instrument for the diagnosis of glaucoma
Rossetti L
PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0122157
60476 Evaluation of subjects with a moderate cup to disc ratio using optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph 3: impact of the disc area
Ulas F
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; 63: 3-8
60551 Structure-Function Correlation Using Confocal Laser Ophthalmoscope in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma
Pappas T
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 377-382
60241 Adaptive optics imaging of healthy and abnormal regions of retinal nerve fiber bundles of patients with glaucoma
Chui TY
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2015; 56: 674-681
60693 Compass: clinical evaluation of a new instrument for the diagnosis of glaucoma
Digiuni M
PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0122157
60551 Structure-Function Correlation Using Confocal Laser Ophthalmoscope in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma
Founti P
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 377-382
60755 Automated Registration of Multimodal Optic Disc Images: Clinical Assessment of Alignment Accuracy
Legg P
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 397-402
60364 Ethnic differences in trabecular meshwork height by optical coherence tomography
Barbosa DT
JAMA ophthalmology 2015; 133: 437-441
60685 Morphological features and important parameters of large optic discs for diagnosing glaucoma
Yamashita K
PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0118920
60316 Evaluation of Corneal Microstructure in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome and Glaucoma: In Vivo Scanning Laser Confocal Microscopic Study
Emre E
Current Eye Research 2015; 0: 1-7
60121 Comparison study of OCT, HRT and VF findings among normal controls and patients with pseudoexfoliation, with or without increased IOP
Georgalas I
Clinical Ophthalmology 2014; 8: 2441-2447
60116 Enhanced structure-function relationship in glaucoma with an anatomically and geometrically accurate neuroretinal rim measurement
Sharpe GP
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2015; 56: 98-105
60736 Cup-to-Disc Ratio From Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and High-Definition Optical Coherence Tomography Agrees Poorly With Clinical Assessment
Foo LL
Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 25: 198-202
60476 Evaluation of subjects with a moderate cup to disc ratio using optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph 3: impact of the disc area
Dogan Ü
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2015; 63: 3-8
