advertisement
Agarwal PK 28
Showing records 1 to 25 | Display only abstracts from Agarwal PK in IGR 19-194828 Minimising prescription errors-a quality improvement project in the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital
Changulani T
International Ophthalmology 2021; 41: 3041-3046 (IGR: 22-2)
95059 Is there an association of socioeconomic deprivation with acute primary angle closure?
Saxby E; Cheng K
Eye 2022; 36: 1246-1252 (IGR: 22-2)
94828 Minimising prescription errors-a quality improvement project in the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital
Mustafa MZ
International Ophthalmology 2021; 41: 3041-3046 (IGR: 22-2)
95059 Is there an association of socioeconomic deprivation with acute primary angle closure?
O'Connell N
Eye 2022; 36: 1246-1252 (IGR: 22-2)
94828 Minimising prescription errors-a quality improvement project in the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital
Ahuja S; James A
International Ophthalmology 2021; 41: 3041-3046 (IGR: 22-2)
95059 Is there an association of socioeconomic deprivation with acute primary angle closure?
Sanders R; Agarwal PK
Eye 2022; 36: 1246-1252 (IGR: 22-2)
94828 Minimising prescription errors-a quality improvement project in the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital
Agarwal PK
International Ophthalmology 2021; 41: 3041-3046 (IGR: 22-2)
81057 Prevalence of treatment with glaucoma medication in Scotland, 2010-2017
Rotchford AP; Hughes J; Agarwal PK; Tatham AJ
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 0: (IGR: 20-3)
76765 Is Patient Knowledge of Glaucoma Improved by Using a Glaucoma Logbook?
Daly R
Journal of Glaucoma 2018; 27: 470-475 (IGR: 19-3)
77129 The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland
Sii S
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 103: 369-373 (IGR: 19-3)
76765 Is Patient Knowledge of Glaucoma Improved by Using a Glaucoma Logbook?
Agarwal PK
Journal of Glaucoma 2018; 27: 470-475 (IGR: 19-3)
77129 The impact of SIGN glaucoma guidelines on false-positive referrals from community optometrists in Central Scotland
Nasser A; Loo CY; Croghan C; Rotchford A; Agarwal PK
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 103: 369-373 (IGR: 19-3)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
McTrusty AD
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Murray IC; Perperidis A
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3 (IGR: 19-1)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Cameron LA; Perperidis A
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Cameron LA; McTrusty AD
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3 (IGR: 19-1)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Brash HM
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Brash HM
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3 (IGR: 19-1)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Tatham AJ
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Tatham AJ
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3 (IGR: 19-1)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Agarwal PK; Murray IC
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Agarwal PK; Fleck BW
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3 (IGR: 19-1)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Fleck BW
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
74358 Comparison of Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Glaucoma. Part I: Threshold Values and Repeatability
Minns RA
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 3 (IGR: 19-1)
74359 Comparison of Threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: Patterns of Visual Field Loss and Acceptability
Minns RA
Translational vision science & technology 2017; 6: 4 (IGR: 19-1)
