advertisement

WGC-2021

6.6.2 Automated (202)

Showing records 1 to 25

Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.2 Automated

Search within classification 6.6.2 Automated
90556 Asymmetry of Macular Vessel Density in Bilateral Early Open-angle Glaucoma With Unilateral Central 10-2 Visual Field Loss
Lu P
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 926-931
89957 Ability of 24-2C and 24-2 Grids to Identify Central Visual Field Defects and Structure-Function Concordance in Glaucoma and Suspects
Phu J
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 219: 317-331
90434 Octopus 900 Automated Kinetic Perimetry versus Standard Automated Static Perimetry in Glaucoma Practice
Rowe FJ
Current Eye Research 2020; 0: 1-13
90382 Comparison of perimetric Glaucoma Staging Systems in Asians with primary glaucoma
Hoang TT
Eye 2020; 0:
90566 Point-wise correlations between 10-2 Humphrey visual field and OCT data in open angle glaucoma
Cirafici P
Eye 2020; 0:
90238 Visual Field Artifacts From Face Mask Use
Young SL
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 989-991
90513 Relationship between peripapillary vessel density and visual field in glaucoma: a broken-stick model
Song MK
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 0:
90421 A Comparison of the Visual Field Parameters of SITA Faster and SITA Standard Strategies in Glaucoma
Lavanya R
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 783-788
90270 The Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Retinal Ganglion Cells - A Step Forward in Early Glaucoma Diagnosis
Potop V
Medical Science Monitor 2020; 26: e924672
90145 Predicting the Glaucomatous Central 10-Degree Visual Field From Optical Coherence Tomography Using Deep Learning and Tensor Regression
Xu L
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 218: 304-313
90758 Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma
Tepelus TC
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 975-980
90834 An Evaluation of a New 24-2 Metric for Detecting Early Central Glaucomatous Damage
Hood DC
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 223: 119-128
90654 Increased Equivalent Input Noise in Glaucomatous Central Vision: Is it Due to Undersampling of Retinal Ganglion Cells?
Liu R
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2020; 61: 10
90688 Value of 10-2 Visual Field Testing in Glaucoma Patients with Early 24-2 Visual Field Loss
West ME
Ophthalmology 2020; 0:
90152 Visual Field Outcomes from the Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Trial (LiGHT)
Wright DM
Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 1313-1321
90593 Associations of Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer and Optic Nerve Head Parameters with Visual Field Sensitivity in Advanced Glaucoma
Hu H
Ophthalmic Research 2020; 0:
90466 Impact of Visual Field Testing on Intraocular Pressure Change Trends in Healthy People and Glaucoma Patients
Li M
Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 2020: 7936205
90667 A Strategy for Seeding Point Error Assessment for Retesting (SPEAR) in Perimetry Applied to Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma
Phu J
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2021; 221: 115-130
90534 The Trajectory of Glaucoma Progression in 2-Dimensional Structural-Functional Space
de Gainza A
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2020; 3: 466-474
90002 A framework for assessing glaucoma progression using structural and functional indices jointly
Abu SL
PLoS ONE 2020; 15: e0235255
90387 Correlations Between Subjective Evaluation of Quality of Life, Visual Field Loss, and Performance in Simulated Activities of Daily Living in Glaucoma Patients
Azoulay-Sebban L
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 970-974
90222 Disc-fovea Angle Is Associated With Visual Field Defect Location in Patients With Glaucoma
Abe RY
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 964-969
90802 Improving Visual Field Trend Analysis with OCT and Deeply Regularized Latent-Space Linear Regression
Xu L
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2020; 0:
90438 Comparing Perimetric Loss at Different Target Intraocular Pressures for Patients with High-Tension and Normal-Tension Glaucoma
DeRoos L
Ophthalmology. Glaucoma 2020; 0:
90416 Influence of automated visual field testing on intraocular pressure
Bertaud S
BMC Ophthalmology 2020; 20: 363

Issue 21-3

Change Issue


advertisement

Oculus