advertisement
6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.) (69)
Showing records 1 to 25
Display all abstracts in classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)
Search within classification 6.6.3 Special methods (e.g. color, contrast, SWAP etc.)90428 Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Suo L
Frontiers in neurology 2020; 11: 777
90654 Increased Equivalent Input Noise in Glaucomatous Central Vision: Is it Due to Undersampling of Retinal Ganglion Cells?
Liu R
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2020; 61: 10
89930 Glaucoma and glare
Hamedani M
Eye 2020; 0:
90386 Using an open-source tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) as a rapid triage measure for glaucoma clinic waiting areas
Jones PR
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 0:
90084 Speed and accuracy of saccades in patients with glaucoma evaluated using an eye tracking perimeter
Tatham AJ
BMC Ophthalmology 2020; 20: 259
90668 Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients
Morbio R
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 0: 1120672120945052
89879 Sample entropy analysis of pupillary signals in glaucoma patients and control via light-induced pupillometry
Bhowmik S
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference 2020; 2020: 280-283
90321 Using eye movements to detect visual field loss: a pragmatic assessment using simulated scotoma
Asfaw DS
Scientific reports 2020; 10: 9782
89974 What is the Nature of the Reach-and-Grasp Deficit in Glaucoma?
Corveleyn X
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 799-806
89954 Macular Damage in Glaucoma is Associated With Deficits in Facial Recognition
Hirji SH
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 217: 1-9
90019 Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Visual Outcomes in Childhood Glaucoma
Tansuebchueasai N
Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus 2020; 57: 283-291
90425 The Relationship between Pupillometric Values and Visual Evoked Potential Test Results in Patients with Early Glaucoma
Işik MU
Optometry and Vision Science 2020; 97: 898-902
90514 Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
Kumar H
Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 2020: 8384509
90144 Unaltered Perception of Suprathreshold Contrast in Early Glaucoma Despite Sensitivity Loss
Bham HA
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2020; 61: 23
90758 Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma
Tepelus TC
Journal of Glaucoma 2020; 29: 975-980
90272 Correlation of retinal sensitivity in microperimetry with vascular density in optical coherence tomography angiography in primary open-angle glaucoma
Zabel K
PLoS ONE 2020; 15: e0235571
89879 Sample entropy analysis of pupillary signals in glaucoma patients and control via light-induced pupillometry
Motin MA
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference 2020; 2020: 280-283
90321 Using eye movements to detect visual field loss: a pragmatic assessment using simulated scotoma
Jones PR
Scientific reports 2020; 10: 9782
90428 Evaluating State-of-the-Art Computerized Pupillary Assessments for Glaucoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhang D
Frontiers in neurology 2020; 11: 777
90668 Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients
Longo C
European Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 0: 1120672120945052
89954 Macular Damage in Glaucoma is Associated With Deficits in Facial Recognition
Liebmann JM
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 217: 1-9
90514 Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
Thulasidas M
Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 2020: 8384509
90144 Unaltered Perception of Suprathreshold Contrast in Early Glaucoma Despite Sensitivity Loss
Dewsbery SD
Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2020; 61: 23
90386 Using an open-source tablet perimeter (Eyecatcher) as a rapid triage measure for glaucoma clinic waiting areas
Lindfield D
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 0:
90084 Speed and accuracy of saccades in patients with glaucoma evaluated using an eye tracking perimeter
Murray IC
BMC Ophthalmology 2020; 20: 259
