advertisement
The multifactorial nature of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) creates unique challenges for advancing diagnostics and precision patient care. Many previous studies have found both high and low blood pressure (BP) to be strongly associated with POAG.1-4 Low ocular perfusion pressure (OPP), calculated from BP and intraocular pressure (IOP), has also been identified as a risk factor for POAG prevalence, incidence and progression in in several population-based studies.5-7 Studies have suggested the importance of maintaining blood flow and metabolic autoregulation across physiological ranges of BP and IOP. Non-physiological dips or spikes in BP and IOP in combination with faulty auto-regulation may result in imbalances that cause low retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion and ultimately retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death and visual field (VF) loss.
In this new prospective analysis, Donkor and colleagues examine the relationship between 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and the rate of change in standard automated perimetry (SAP) in 124 eyes with glaucoma (91) and suspected glaucoma (33) over 4 years. The researchers found lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic BP at baseline, as well as low systolic BP during follow-up were significantly associated with faster rates of SAP mean deviation (MD) loss.
Lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systolic BP at baseline, as well as low systolic BP during follow-up were significantly associated with faster rates of SAP mean deviation (MD) loss
The results are in line with the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial6 and complement the previous work of Jammal et al. who found that when adjusted for IOP, lower MAP and diastolic arterial pressure during follow-up were significantly associated with faster rates of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss in subjects from the Duke Glaucoma Registry.2 Strengths of the study by Donkor et al. include diurnal 24-hour ABPM and adjusting for potential confounding variables including age, IOP during follow-up, central corneal thickness, and the severity of VF loss. Limitations include absence of structural assessments including OCT assessed-RNFL, inclusion of both glaucoma and glaucoma suspects in a single cohort and no healthy controls, mixed medication use among patients and not directly assessing retinal and ONH blood flow.
The outstanding work by Donkor and associates provides exciting new prospective data linking lower systolic BP and MAP to glaucomatous VF progression. This novel contribution strengthens the paradigm that certain POAG patients may benefit from including BP in their risk assessment, especially those when a patient’s IOP is low. Interestingly, another recently highlighted article by Pham et al. (JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025;143(1):25-32. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4868) (see preceding comment 121260) confirmed glaucoma and suspects over 8 years found both high and low mean BP combined with higher SD of BP and high or low IOP respectfully, were associated with faster VF progression (MD slopes). Both studies would benefit from using OCTA or other techniques to understand the impact of lower BP, MAP and OPP on retinal and ONH perfusion and metabolism. Overall, these complimentary results further reinforce the need for using advanced data science tools, including artificial intelligence and mathematical applications, to identify the combinations of BP and IOP that elevate an individual’s risk for the onset and progression of glaucoma.8