advertisement
Three classes of genes: those that are up-regulated, those that are down-regulated, and those that have unchanged expression patterns.
The major contributors to up-regulated genes come from activated Müller and glial cells and from ganglion cells that alternatively exhibit a stress response (e.g., a heat shock response), and then the activation of genes that execute the cell death program.
The molecular changes in gene expression in response to ocular hypertension represents a complex response from different cell-types in the retina.
IOP is important at all levels of IOP because the ONH is a 'high stress' environment in which IOP-related stress and strain within the ONH connective tissues influences blood flow, the astrocyte basement membrane, and axonal nutrition even at low levels of IOP.
IOP-related damage to the axons within the ONH can occur at all levels of IOP by a variety of mechanisms, and may be astrocyte- and glial-cell-mediated, regardless of the inciting insult.
IOP-related damage to the connective tissues can occur at all levels of IOP. This is important, not only because it contributes to axonal damage, but also because it centrally underlies (and explains) the phenomenon of 'glaucomatous' cupping.
The major site of aqueous outflow resistance is in the cribriform or juxtacanalicular region of the TM. Quantity and quality of the extracellular matrix (EM) in this region appear to modulate TM outflow resistance.
There is an increase in fibrillar EM in the cribriform region of eyes with POAG. The increase of TGF-b in the aqueous humor of eyes with POAG is likely to contribute to the increase in trabecular EM.
Most of the TGF-b in the aqueous humor of normal and glaucomatous eyes is in a latent form. Thrombospondin-1 is a very potent endogenous activator of TGF-b. The TM shows a strong expression of thrombospondin-1 that very likely activates TGF-b. This local activation may be critically required to regulate EM turnover in the TM.
In a rat model, optic disc cupping and axonal loss are highly correlated to the level of induced intraocular pressure elevation.
There can be loss of axons despite a normal-appearing optic disc (visualized with modified scanning laser tomography), suggesting that cupping is a phenomenon with a pressure-related threshold and is not necessarily due to axonal loss.
The above finding is supported by evidence from an ischemia-induced model of optic nerve damage in which ganglion cells are lost with normal pressures and no cupping.
Rather than list ARVO's 'Top-10' papers, as I was asked to do by the Managing Editor, I will share my top ARVO experiences from a different perspective. I would first like to mention that the glaucoma mini-symposium on 'IOP: the forgotten risk factor' organized chiefly by this year's Program Committee Chairman, Clive Migdal, was particularly impressive. Equally impressive were the talks in the 'New Ideas' session, in which I found Mansoor Sarfarazi's work on optineurin mutations in glaucoma patients particularly compelling. This year, I attended many sessions on macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. After all, the main cell of concern to glaucomatologists, the retinal ganglion cell, lies in the province of the retina. The comparison of research presently being done in that field to that done in glaucoma, was quite revealing.
Despite the wealth of evidence that the retinal changes underlying dry ARMD appear to be inflammatory and involve the immune system, I was surprised that a special interest group meeting was held only this year to discuss the evidence as to whether ARMD is an immune-mediated disease. As many of you may recall, Michal Schwartz and I co-chaired a glaucoma special interest meeting at last year's ARVO that addressed similar concerns pertinent to immune system involvement in glaucoma. Could it be that our field is a more enlightened one than retina in appreciating the role of the immune system in disease pathogenesis?
In my efforts to learn more about proliferative macular degeneration, I discovered that the animal models used mainly rely on laser treatment to induce breaks in the RPE in order to elicit subretinal angiogenesis, and are not particularly relevant to the natural history of human wet ARMD. I found that the same caveats could be applied to models of diabetic retinopathy and inner retinal neovascularization. In the case of the former, streptozotocin-treated rats do acquire a re-tinopathy, but this only occurs when the animals are long-lived, thus this disease model has limited pragmatic utility for investigators. Simi-larly, inner retinal neovascularization models are primarily obtained with oxygen supplementation in young rodents in order to achieve retinopathy of prematurity, which also has limited utility to the natural history of human proliferative retinal disease in an elderly population. Therefore, considering the vast number of proliferating animal models we now use to elicit glaucoma, spanning mice to monkeys, we seem to have a distinct edge in methodology regarding animal models that will help us answer the questions that interest us the most. Thus, here too, we seem to have the upper hand over our retina colleagues.
Finally, I was intrigued that many of the studies currently under way using anti-proliferative therapies, such as those directed against VEGF, were approved by the FDA for human trials with what appears to be far less data than those obtained prior to previous trials for many glaucoma agents. The FDA is primarily concerned with safety and toxicity. But it would seem that the appropriate studies to determine efficacy regarding dosage, and the endpoints used, particularly with regard to those agents designed for intravitreal injections on a recurring six-week interval now commencing in humans, were not as stringently determined as those that preceded the phase III clinical trials for many of our glaucoma agents. Once again, in comparison to retina, the glaucoma community can be proud that its drugs are typically developed in a manner that yields more rigorous efficacy data prior to widespread use in clinical trials.
In summary, this year's ARVO left me with a strong impression that, by many criteria, the pragmatic utility of the science presently performed in glaucoma research compares very favorably with, and in many cases exceeds, the work currently being performed in analogous fields such as retinal research.
As a child, I had images of the 21st century offering surgery with magic scalpels and the body being made to heal with modern high technology medicines. As I wandered through the halls maintained with high technology arctic cooling temperatures in the middle of tropical Florida, browsing my electronic based abstract book, I used this template to identify papers in the glaucoma surgery and wound healing category to give us some perspective as to how far we have come.
First of all, there are high technology scalpels and devices. There was an interesting surgical plasma cutter from the Stanford group presented by a physicist (No. 941, Palanker et al.). Another high technology surgical tool from the Cologne group was the use of photodynamic therapy to prevent wound healing, using a subconjunctival injection of sensitizing agent, followed by blue light targeted to a specific area (No. 3337, Jordan et al.). There are new materials now available for drainage devices, but biological reactions to these materials are still apparent, although they are better in some materials. The biomaterials group from Miami tested a range of materials in a rabbit model and found that hydrophillic polymers (hydrogels) resulted in the least reaction (No. 3371, Fernandez et al.). Another high technology use of modern materials was the slow release pellet of dexamethasone in phacotrabeculectomy introduced by the Singapore group (No. 3346, Seah et al.). However, clearly these are still new technologies and the problems of the healing eye and scarring have not yet been fully overcome, as failures will and are still occurring. Several new drainage devices were on show, but as yet, the major problem of healing following surgery has not been solved.
Twenty-first century cell and molecular biology featured strongly in the presentations covering modulation of healing. The use of antimetabolites has revolutionized filtration surgery, but many problems still occur despite the use of larger treatment areas and scleral flaps, which has reduced the bleb-related complications very significantly in our center. More sophisticated approaches to modulating post-surgical scarring were apparent. The role of specific growth factors, particularly transforming growth factor beta, continues to excite interest. The Erlangen group have found that fibroblasts of patients with pseudoexfoliation, in which there is an excessive deposition of an abnormal matrix material, seem to respond to lower concentrations of this growth factor (No. 3367, Kottler et al.). The Wurzberg group have shown that, in patients with pseudoexfoliation, laser trabeculoplasty appears to raise the aqueous levels of TGF-beta significantly (No. 3344, Wimmer et al.). In a randomized masked pilot study, the use of a human antibody to TGF-beta 2 (CAT-152), created by modern molecular cloning techniques not even dreamt of a few decades ago, showed that a greater proportion of patients following phacotrabeculectomy had an intraocular pressure < 22 mmHg (100% versus 80% controls) at one year of follow-up (No. 3331, Broadway et al.). Given that glaucoma is a lifelong disease, the long-term control of healing is in some ways even more important. Delayed postoperative injections of the TGF-beta 2 antibody (CAT 152) prolonged the long-term survival of the bleb in an experimental model of filtration surgery compared with 5-FU and control (No. 3332, Mead et al.), which is potentially very important for the long-term control of intraocular pressure.
Finally, other novel approaches to scarring control were also presented. The protein p21 inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases, enzymes required for cell proliferation. The gene for p21 was inserted into an adenovirus which was then injected subconjunctivally in a monkey model of glaucoma and filtration surgery. This showed promising effects on bleb function and the prevention of cupping (No. 1940, Faha et al.). The enzymes known as matrix metalloproteinases are important in wound healing. The very active Cologne group showed that these enzymes are present in Tenon's fibroblasts (No. 3333, Esser et al.). Inhibition of these enzymes with a drug designed with a high specificity for these enzymes dramatically reduced scarring, yet resulted in diffuse non-cystic blebs in a masked randomized study in an aggressive model of filtration surgery (No. 870, Wong et al.).
Therefore, 21st Century technology was definitely in evidence. We are not quite there yet (perfect glaucoma surgery with the long-term control of scarring and intraocular pressure), but given the evidence, there are good prospects that we may be in the near future.