advertisement

Topcon

Yu M 9

Showing records 1 to 9 | Display all abstracts from Yu M

82301 Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
Ye Y
Journal of Glaucoma 2019; 28: 922-928
82153 The Mechanical Interpretation of Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters
Qin X; Yu M
BioMed research international 2019; 2019: 5701236
82301 Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
Yang Y
Journal of Glaucoma 2019; 28: 922-928
82153 The Mechanical Interpretation of Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters
Zhang H
BioMed research international 2019; 2019: 5701236
82301 Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
Fan Y
Journal of Glaucoma 2019; 28: 922-928
82153 The Mechanical Interpretation of Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters
Chen X
BioMed research international 2019; 2019: 5701236
82301 Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
Lan M
Journal of Glaucoma 2019; 28: 922-928
82153 The Mechanical Interpretation of Ocular Response Analyzer Parameters
Li L
BioMed research international 2019; 2019: 5701236
82301 Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
Yu K; Yu M
Journal of Glaucoma 2019; 28: 922-928

Issue 20-4

Change Issue


advertisement

Nidek