advertisement

---

Schmetterer L 14

Showing records 1 to 14 | Display all abstracts from Schmetterer L

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Chiang CYN
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Parakkel RR
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Braeu FA
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Wong D
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Chuangsuwanich T
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Li C
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Tan RKY
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Cheong J
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Chua J
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Nongpiur ME; Chong RS
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Schmetterer L; Thiery AH
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Aung T; Schmetterer L
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---

118332 Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography
Buist ML; Girard MJA
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 5

---

117967 Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Damage Assessment in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Retinal Retardance Measured by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Liu X; Chua J
Translational vision science & technology 2024; 13: 9

---